Derek D. Reed (Institute for Behavior Resources)
Thomas S. Critchfield (Illinois State University)
The idealistic 1960s brimmed with optimism that humanity might finally achieve peaceful coexistence. But was there really enough Aquarian energy to power a collaboration between scholarly behemoths who history records as the bitterest of enemies?
There are certain things you expect to find while conducting archival research in elite university collections. You expect dull memoranda, crumbling hand-written correspondence, and the occasional sharp-tongued marginal note from a senior scholar irritated that someone has misused the phrase in principle. You do not, repeat do not, expect to discover a recording of arch rivals B.F. Skinner and Noam Chomsky performing a protest-folk duet under the band name Stimulus and Syntax. And yet that is precisely what we found during a recent visit to the Harvard University Historical Archives.
To appreciate the magnitude of this discovery, you have to recall the conventional historical narrative. Skinner, architect of radical behaviorism and author of Verbal Behavior, sought to explain language in terms of functional relations, reinforcement histories, and socially mediated contingencies. Chomsky, in his now-famous review of Verbal Behavior, argued that such an account failed to address the innate, rule-driven, and structurally creative features of human language. Chomsky’s brutally dismissive review was seen by many as a turning point, the moment in which behaviorism was finally debunked and replaced by a “cognitive revolution.”
Skinner and Chomsky did in fact disagree about nearly everything, right up to their respective deaths (e.g., see this interview with Chomsky, conducted shortly before he passed). But what the history books don’t mention — because until now no one knew — is that these titans of theory may also have spent at least one evening singing politely-devastating verses at each other in what we can only describe as a deeply committed act of musical détente.
💢 Prelude: Fenway Or Bust 💢
June, 2025. A balmy late Spring day in Boston, where we planned to take in one of those classic showdowns between the Red Sox and the hated New York Yankees (aka the Evil Empire, the Stankees, the Bronx Bummers, the Childish Bambinos) at Fenway Park. We had some time to kill before the game, so we dropped in at the nearby Harvard Archives to see what interesting Skinner artifacts might be stashed there.
Suffice it to say, we never made it to Fenway.
On a whim we requested several boxes of uncatalogued material from a collection vaguely described as “Miscellaneous Faculty Recordings, 1957–1974,” and a friendly archivist set us up in a listening booth with headphones and an era-appropriate reel-to-reel tape machine. After four tedious hours of reviewing nothing special — pretentious lectures, room-tone tests, and a disorienting recording of three philosophers singing a madrigal in Serbo-Croatian — we happened upon a narrow cardboard carton bearing the handwritten label shown at right. Inside was a neatly spooled reel, a mimeographed lyric sheet, a grainy black and white photo, and a small index card reading, “The Generative Divide — take 4.”
💢 The Duet 💢
Based on the carton’s oxymoronic carton label (“Stimulus and Syntax”), we thought it might contain some puerile graduate-student parody of the Skinner/Chomsky controversy. But what emerged from our headphones was far from parody. It was, impossibly, a sincere and musically committed folk duet in which Skinner and Chomsky expounded, in alternating verses — on language, theory, and the nature of scientific explanation — before arriving at a chorus of principled disagreement in close harmony. There was guitar and classic folk-style open chord progression and a tempo best described as “Cambridge coffeehouse with unresolved theoretical tension.” And there was no logical reason for any of it to exist.
The photograph below, likely from the early 1960s, documents an event in a smallish room with a tiny stage and seating for perhaps two dozen listeners, apparently mostly students. It’s just the kind of setting in which two rivals, after a cocktail or three, might well say something like, “What if we settled this through song?”
Image courtesy of the Archive.
💢 The Tape 💢
The recording, which you can hear at the bottom of this post, does not seem to be from a public performance.
In light of the “demo” and “take 4” designations in the Archives, it rather seems to be from a studio session that could have been fueled by positive reception of the performance.
One clue: Scratched into the metal reel (right) are the tiny letters “ACF” or “ACE.” If the latter, that could refer to Boston’s Ace Studios, which during the 1950s and 1960s produced popular-music hits like Freddy Cannon’s “Tallahassee Lassie” and Frankie Ford’s “Sea Cruise.” The audio of the Skinner-Chomsky recording certainly is consistent with the four-track technology that Ace Studios employed in the 1960s.
💢 The Song 💢
Unsurprisingly for a song whose composers built careers on lecturing, “The Generative Divide” does go on a bit. But on the positive side, the song blends technical language and folk-poetic phrasing with unnerving confidence. Terms like mand, tact, verbal community, generative grammar, and unbounded use appear not as comic embellishments but as genuine lyrical content. Against all probability it works. Chomsky, singing first, acknowledges that some of his earlier critique may have been unnecessarily harsh. Skinner responds not with capitulation but with explanation of his lack of a formal counterattack in print: namely, that he preferred to let programmatic work, empirical application, and scientific practice stand as his answer. This is followed not by reconciliation in any strict theoretical sense, but by something stranger and more beautiful: harmonized disagreement.
“The Generative Divide” illustrates that a song need not be great to be monumental, and it’s difficult to overstate the intellectual violence this one does to expectations…. not least because the two men sing so similarly that it is sometimes hard to tell when they’ve passed the lead. Despite being worlds apart theoretically, Skinner the rural functionalist and Chomsky the urban structuralist intone almost literally with a single voice. It’s fitting, given the topic of contention, that you sometimes have to listen carefully to the words to be sure of who is who.
💢 The Band 💢
The name “Stimulus and Syntax” of course cannot escape scrutiny. Of all the evidence pointing to an improbable duet that bridged an unspannable theoretical chasm, the band name is the most suspect.
That is to say, Stimulus and Syntax is so transparently on the nose that it would normally fail the test of plausibility — it in fact sounds like just the sort of thing that would be dreamed up for a low-caliber graduate-student parody. And yet, in light of the intellectual adventurousness that both Skinner and Chomsky displayed in their respective careers, one can easily imagine “Stimulus and Syntax” first scrawled on a napkin as a joke at some faculty gathering… then discussed casually as a whimsical what-if… then suddenly taking shape as a project with a life of its own.
Whatever else may be said of the name, it captures the precise poles of the Skinner/Chomsky dispute: the environmentally shaped and the inwardly structured, the observable contingency and the latent grammatical form. It is simultaneously ridiculous and elegant. It is, in a word, perfect.
💢 The Voices 💢
Photographic evidence verifies that a monumental musical meeting actually took place. We cannot, however, prove that the voices in the recording belong to Skinner and Chomsky, particularly given the singers’ exaggerated folksy affectations.
It is well known that Skinner had a musical streak. In his youth he played saxophone and piano (see pp. 138-141 in Particulars Of My Life, and listen here), so it’s possible he could also have picked up guitar at some point. It may be informative that daughter Julie Skinner Vargas later became an accomplished guitarist with a knack for surprising performances (see “Julie” below).
Julie
Unfortunately, the Burrhis Skinner Foundation tells us that there are no known recordings of Skinner in song that could validate the archived tape. The same appears to be true for Chomsky. We know that he was not averse to a stage spectacle, and that in later years he contributed spoken voiceovers to musical projects. Perhaps he had musical chops that have not been widely publicized.
💢 The Implications 💢
Assuming the tape we discovered is genuine, it’s obvious that whatever surge of collegiality spawned Stimulus and Syntax did not last for long. That a recording was made suggests Skinner and Chomsky contemplated sharing their song beyond the event in the photo. That the recording ultimately was buried in an uncatalogued collection hints that they had second thoughts about how it might be received. Did they fear it would make them look unserious? That it would dilute the firm theoretical positions to which they were so passionately committed? Alternatively, maybe the project simply became overshadowed by other priorities as the two mens’ careers shifted into overdrive in the 1960s. Unless additional relevant materials can be unearthed from the Archives, the world may never know. But baseball season is coming up. Soon we’ll be back in Boston giving this our best effort.
For now, there’s a performance photo and there’s a tape, presumably but not certifiably connected. For us, that’s enough circumstantial evidence to suggest enormous scholarly implications, of which we’ll mention three.
- Our discovery should temper any tendency to narrate the Skinner/Chomsky relationship in exclusively adversarial terms. Clearly, there was enough mutual awareness—and perhaps enough mutual theatricality—to sustain at least one collaborative performance.
- Our discovery suggests that even the sternest disputes of 20th Century thought may have contained undercurrents of wit, play, and deeply impractical musical ambition that are not preserved in the scholarly record.
- Most importantly, our discovery confirms what many people have long suspected: Academics will, given the slightest provocation, but especially when it is not possible to convene a committee meeting, form a band rather than process their disagreements normally.
💢 The Legacy 💢
Every audiophile knows that the music world sometimes spawns acts that exert influence far out of proportion to their commercial and popular success: Think Big Star, The Spiders, Booker Little, Odetta Holmes…. Sometime during the 1960s, Stimulus and Syntax burst into being, burned brightly in a one-night-only public appearance, and then extinguished into obscurity. We can’t help but think that a performance so cosmic and so unexpected would have left those fortunate few in attendance forever changed.
A possible case in point: Could the audience member highlighted at right be a young Dennis Ritchie (Harvard Class of 1963), who went on to develop the Unix operating system and C programming language? These tools exerted “sweeping influence on the modern world” by allowing humans to command the power of computers without an engineer’s understanding of arcane assembly language. Such a seamless melding of Man and Machine is precisely what you’d expect from someone whose world view was imprinted upon the unlikely musical integration of irreconcilable perspectives.
If in fact Stimulus and Syntax transformed those lucky listeners, and if they passed their inspiration along to others — well, perhaps that one propitious performance launched an invisible legacy that’s every bit as far reaching as the published work for which Skinner and Chomsky are remembered. And perhaps that provides hope for society as a whole. There is of course far too much rancor and division in our world, too much internecine squabbling and tribal chest thumping. But if thinkers as antagonistic and opinionated as Skinner and Chomsky could find a way to co-exist, even collaborate, then maybe, just maybe, the rest of us can learn to get along as well.
💢 “The Generative Divide” 💢
The tape we discovered was in poor condition — unsurprising since 1960s-era magnetic tapes degrade within a few decades unless stored under ideal conditions, which was not the case at the Archives. Here’s a digitally restored version of the recording:
And here, for completeness of the historical record, is the unrestored version.
Happy April Fool’s Day (poisson d’avril in France, Hunt the Gowk Day in Scotland; Dia das Mentiras in Brazil; Prima Aprilis in Poland; Aprilscherz in Germany). For those who reside outside of heavily European-influenced countries: April Fools is when you express affection for others with lies or sadistic acts — or, if you care very deeply, both deceit and cruelty. In our estimation that tells you pretty much all you need to know to understand Western culture. In any case, we have never visited the Harvard Archives and do not plan to. Honestly that sounds super boring, and anyway our anti-elitist hillbilly-esque upbringings prevent us from giving Harvard the satisfaction of thinking we care about it. The text of this post was drafted by ChatGPT and edited by us. The Skinner/Chomsky photo and image of the cardboard carton were generated by Google Gemini and ChaptGPT, respectively. “Generative Divide” lyrics were authored by ChatGPT, with music and vocals supplied by the Suno app. The Stimulus and Syntax band logo is so apt and powerful that it created itself. The Julie Vargas performance with Styx is not beyond imagining because Julie really is very good with a guitar, but contrary to our statement above, yes, we are in fact making this up. Oh, and for the record (See what we did there? Pun on “record”? We crack ourselves up.), based on the speaking voices of Skinner and Chomsky we do not think we would like to actually hear them sing.
Pingback: Applied Behavioral Musicology: Classic Behavior Analysis Publications, In Song – BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS BLOGS